linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] bpf: Add new bpf map type for timer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 19 Oct 2015 14:30:55 +0800
From:	kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To:	He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>
Cc:	kbuild-all@...org, ast@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	daniel@...earbox.net, mingo@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
	xiakaixu@...wei.com, wangnan0@...wei.com, hekuang@...wei.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] bpf: Add new bpf map type for timer

Hi He,

[auto build test WARNING on v4.3-rc6 -- if it's inappropriate base, please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/He-Kuang/bpf-Add-new-bpf-map-type-for-timer/20151019-133809
reproduce:
        # apt-get install sparse
        make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
        make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__


sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)

>> kernel/bpf/arraymap.c:341:22: sparse: symbol 'bpf_timer_callback' was not declared. Should it be static?

Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/