lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 19 Oct 2015 13:46:06 -0400
From:	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>
To:	William Dauchy <wdauchy@...il.com>
Cc:	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
	Bruce Fields <bfields@...ldses.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
	ktsan <ktsan@...glegroups.com>,
	Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: fix data races on inode->i_flctx

On Mon, 2015-10-19 at 19:24 +0200, William Dauchy wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 6:53 PM, William Dauchy <wdauchy@...il.com>
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 6:44 PM, Jeff Layton <
> > jlayton@...chiereds.net> wrote:
> > > This should be fixed by this series of four commits that are
> > > already in
> > > mainline:
> > > bcd7f78d078ff6197715c1ed070c92aca57ec12c..ee296d7c5709440f8abd36b
> > > 5b65c6
> > > b3e388538d9
> > 
> > Am I missing something, I see three of them between
> > bcd7f78d078ff6197715c1ed070c92aca57ec12c..ee296d7c5709440f8abd36b5b
> > 65c6b3e388538d9
> > (and not four)
> > 
> > ee296d7c5709440f8abd36b5b65c6b3e388538d9 locks: inline
> > posix_lock_file_wait and flock_lock_file_wait
> > 83bfff23e9ed19f37c4ef0bba84e75bd88e5cf21 nfs4: have do_vfs_lock
> > take
> > an inode pointer
> > 29d01b22eaa18d8b46091d3c98c6001c49f78e4a locks: new helpers -
> > flock_lock_inode_wait and posix_lock_inode_wait
> 
> I suppose I found the missing one
> bcd7f78 locks: have flock_lock_file take an inode pointer instead of
> a filp
> 

Ahh yes, sorry -- that one is also required.

Thanks!
-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ