linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c: Enable Cadence driver for ARM64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 27 Oct 2015 00:06:19 +0900
From:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc:	Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, monstr@...str.eu,
	Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@...omium.org>,
	David Box <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>,
	Kamal Dasu <kdasu.kdev@...il.com>,
	Joachim Eastwood <manabian@...il.com>,
	Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Neelesh Gupta <neelegup@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Subhendu Sekhar Behera <sbehera@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: Enable Cadence driver for ARM64

Hello,

On 10/27/2015 12:00 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2015, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 02:32:36PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> Regarding your address list -- it's too big.  Most of your addressees
>>> don't care about this patch.  Please be more selective when sending
>>> patches to people, most of us have enough (relevant) mail as it is.
>>
>> Probably more effective than to write every user of get_maintainer.pl:
>> Patch it to not use git history by default and win the fight ;)
>

Agreed, coincidentally I was telling people today that get_maintainers.pl
only provides a suggestion and that it should not be followed blindly.

> Geert wrote to Joe today.  Let's see if he can improve things.
> 

What about something like the following patch until Joe writes a more
smarter git fallback version?

>From d6dc34810d24f33afb3c158d519966c1b6167a2f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 23:46:52 +0900
Subject: [RFC PATCH] get_maintainer: Don't fallback to git by default

The get_maintainer.pl script could be used to get a list of people that
has to be in the copy list when posting patches for a given file but it
defaults to git fallback so the list returned isn't really relevant and
submitters are posting patches to random developers that just happened
to touch that file in the past.

Disable git fallback so get_maintainer.pl only returns the information
that is in MAINTAINERS by default.

Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
---
 scripts/get_maintainer.pl | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/scripts/get_maintainer.pl b/scripts/get_maintainer.pl
index 98bae869f6d0..b52ae26270e8 100755
--- a/scripts/get_maintainer.pl
+++ b/scripts/get_maintainer.pl
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ my $email_git = 0;
 my $email_git_all_signature_types = 0;
 my $email_git_blame = 0;
 my $email_git_blame_signatures = 1;
-my $email_git_fallback = 1;
+my $email_git_fallback = 0;
 my $email_git_min_signatures = 1;
 my $email_git_max_maintainers = 5;
 my $email_git_min_percent = 5;
-- 
2.4.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/