linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] hwmon: (fam15h_power) Add ptsc counter value for accumulated power

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 26 Oct 2015 05:36:45 +0100
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To:	Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>
Cc:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Andreas Herrmann <herrmann.der.user@...il.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Fr�d�ric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	lm-sensors@...sensors.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	x86@...nel.org,
	Andreas Herrmann <herrmann.der.user@...glemail.com>,
	Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@....com>,
	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>, Tony Li <tony.li@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] hwmon: (fam15h_power) Add ptsc counter value
 for accumulated power

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:37:23AM +0800, Huang Rui wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 06:59:19AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 10/19/2015 07:28 PM, Huang Rui wrote:
> > >PTSC is the performance timestamp counter value in a cpu core and the
> > >cores in one compute unit have the fixed frequency. So it picks up the
> > >performance timestamp counter value of the first core per compute unit
> > >to measure the interval for average power per compute unit.
> > >
> > >Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>
> > >Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> > >Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> > >Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> > >Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> > >---
> > >  arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 1 +
> > >  drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c     | 5 +++++
> > >  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)

...

> > >@@ -132,6 +134,9 @@ static void do_read_registers_on_cu(void *_data)
> > >
> > >  	WARN_ON(rdmsrl_safe(MSR_F15H_CU_PWR_ACCUMULATOR,
> > >  			    &data->cu_acc_power[cu]));
> > >+
> > >+	WARN_ON(rdmsrl_safe(MSR_F15H_PTSC,
> > >+			    &data->cpu_sw_pwr_ptsc[cu]));
> > >  }
> > 
> > I am not really happy with those WARN_ON, or even an error message.
> > If the error is seen, it may be persistent.
> > 
> > If an error check is really needed here, it might make more sense to store
> > the read error and return it to user space if the respective sysfs attribute
> > is read.
> > 
> 
> I am OK with removing WARN_ON here. Boris, if you also agree with it,

The real question should be: are those MSR accesses behind a CPUID flag check
which guarantees their existence?

If so, you don't really need WARN_ONs. And the MSR accesses better be
behind a CPUID flag anyway because reading non-existent MSRs is pretty
much pure waste of energy.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/