lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 31 Oct 2015 01:41:10 +0000
From:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
	"arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: uniphier: enable UniPhier SoCs pinctrl
 drivers by default

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 02:33:34PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 3:28 AM, Masahiro Yamada
> <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
> 
> > Add "default y" to the Kconfig rather than adding entries into
> > arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
> 
> (...)
> > config PINCTRL_UNIPHIER_PH1_LD4
> >         tristate "UniPhier PH1-LD4 SoC pinctrl driver"
> > +       default y
> >         select PINCTRL_UNIPHIER_CORE
> 
> Why is it not default y if <PH1_LD4_SOC_THING>?
> 
> So it is only turned on if the corresponding SoC is selected?
> 
> Or don't you have symbols like that?
> 
> ARM SoC folks: can you ACK this patch indicating that this is the way
> you wanna handle this?

Most other will have a "default MACH_<foo>", but Uniphier lacks those Kconfig
symbols. Or even a def_bool for that platform such that it's not an option if
the platform is enabled. It makes no sense to enable a platform but not the
pinctrl on it, so that's a good way to do it.

I would honestly rather have those in the mach makefile, and make the drivers
select the right thing by default, than having to know exactly which drivers to
enable for a specific SoC.


-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ