linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 1 (lightnvm)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 2 Nov 2015 23:34:37 +0100
From:	Matias Bjorling <m@...rling.me>
To:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
Cc:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 1 (lightnvm)

On 11/02/2015 04:37 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 11/02/2015 05:43 AM, Matias Bjorling wrote:
>> On 11/02/2015 02:16 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> On 11/01/15 08:53, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I start again a day early, and this is how you all repay me? ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Changes since 20151022:
>>>>
>>>
>>> on i386:
>>>
>>> ../include/linux/lightnvm.h:143:4: error: width of 'resved' exceeds
>>> its type
>>>
>>> # CONFIG_LBDAF is not set
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Thanks Randy.
>>
>> Jens, how would you like to receive the patch? (I've currently attached
>> it in this mail)
> 
> If it really needs to be 64-bit regardless of LBDAF, just make it a u64
> instead of typedef'ing some new ppa_t that everybody would have to look up.
> 

Sure, patch attached.

View attachment "0001-lightnvm-refactor-phys-addrs-type-to-u64.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (5165 bytes)