linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] dmaselftest: add memcpy selftest support functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 3 Nov 2015 08:31:57 -0600
From:	Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
To:	Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>,
	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
Cc:	dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, cov@...eaurora.org, jcm@...hat.com,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] dmaselftest: add memcpy selftest support functions

Sinan Kaya wrote:
>
> Almost all DMA engine drivers come with some sort of selftest code
> called from probe. I followed the same design pattern.

As others have said, it appears that's outdated.

Is there a real possibility that the hardware could fail the test 
without trashing the system?  It seems that if the DMA engine is faulty, 
it won't "politely" fail.  The whole system will crash or some memory 
will get corrupted and you won't know it.

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/