[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 14:07:31 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: digitaleric@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Infinite loops in microcode while running guests
On 11/11/2015 13:47, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
>>
> I just finished running a couple of tests in a KVM instance running
> nested on a Xen HVM instance, and found no issues, so for the set as a
> whole:
>
> Tested-by: Austin S. Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@...il.com>
>
> Now to hope the equivalent fix for Xen gets into the Gentoo repositories
> soon, as the issue propagates down through nested virtualization and
> ties up the CPU regardless (and in turn triggers the watchdog).
Note that nested guests should _not_ lock up the outer (L0) hypervisor
if the outer hypervisor has the fix. At least this is the case for KVM:
a fixed outer KVM can protect any vulnerable nested (L1) hypervisor from
malicious nested guests. A vulnerable outer KVM is also protected if
the nested hypervisor has the workaround.
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists