linux-kernel - RE: PING: [PATCH] net: smsc911x: Reset PHY during initialization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:04:39 +0300
From:	Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@...sung.com>
To:	'David Miller' <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	steve.glendinning@...well.net
Subject: RE: PING: [PATCH] net: smsc911x: Reset PHY during initialization

 Hello!

> >> If you think I should reconsider the patch, you should resubmit it.
> >
> >  I understand this, of course. But, before doing this i'd like to
> > clarify your concern, why exactly you think that loopback test will
> > break.
> 
> If I didn't reply it means I don't have anything constructive to say
> to you, and probably I'll end up agreeing with your analysis of the
> loopback test issue.
> 
> I'm not going to ask more than one more time for you to repost your
> patch.

 But, in this case, i don't have anything to change, do i? Or is it
just a formal requirement to RESEND? I can do this, if you want to.

Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research center Russia


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/