linux-kernel - Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Introduce the request handling for dm-crypt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 12 Nov 2015 01:05:40 -0800
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>
Cc:	Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>, axboe@...nel.dk,
	keith.busch@...el.com, jack@...e.cz, arnd@...db.de, neilb@...e.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
	broonie@...nel.org, dineshg@...cinc.com, tj@...nel.org,
	bart.vanassche@...disk.com, jmoyer@...hat.com, agk@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Introduce the request handling for
 dm-crypt

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 01:18:13PM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> But I'm trying to keep an open mind... show me data that real hardware
> _really_ benefits and we'll go from there.  Again, it needs to be "OMG,
> this is amazing!" level performance to warrant any further serious
> consideration.

Also the numbers should be on 4.3+ with our arbitrarily sizeds bios,
and a file system that isn't stupid and actually submits bios (xfs,
btrfs for example).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/