linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf test: Fix 2 bugs in 'perf test BPF'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 17 Nov 2015 10:34:25 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:	pi3orama <pi3orama@....com>
Cc:	Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>, masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com,
	ast@...nel.org, lizefan@...wei.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] perf test: Fix 2 bugs in 'perf test BPF'

Em Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 09:01:41PM +0800, pi3orama escreveu:
> 发自我的 iPhone
> > 在 2015年11月17日，下午8:56，Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> 写道：
> > It is now the only test to emit some message in non-verbose mode that is not
> > "Ok", "FAILED!" or "Skip" :-)
 
> Please see 5/5. In that patch I try to fix it throughly by output redirection.

Yeah, I saw it, perhaps next time you could have it in a different
order, i.e. as soon as you saw that this message was out of place,
needing a fix, you back off a bit from what you're doing, do the fix,
then resume work, so that when someone goes on testing your patches one
by one, the message doesn't appear. 

Anyway, all patches applied, doing a build-test on a few distros now,
will go to Ingo today, thanks!

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/