linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] fs/ceph: ceph_frag_contains

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 17 Nov 2015 22:04:24 +0800
From:	"Yan, Zheng" <zyan@...hat.com>
To:	Yaowei Bai <baiyaowei@...s.chinamobile.com>
Cc:	Sage Weil <sage@...hat.com>, idryomov@...il.com,
	ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fs/ceph: ceph_frag_contains_value can be boolean


> On Nov 17, 2015, at 14:52, Yaowei Bai <baiyaowei@...s.chinamobile.com> wrote:
> 
> This patch makes ceph_frag_contains_value return bool to improve
> readability due to this particular function only using either one or
> zero as its return value.
> 
> No functional change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yaowei Bai <baiyaowei@...s.chinamobile.com>
> ---
> include/linux/ceph/ceph_frag.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/ceph/ceph_frag.h b/include/linux/ceph/ceph_frag.h
> index 970ba5c..b827e06 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ceph/ceph_frag.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ceph/ceph_frag.h
> @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ static inline __u32 ceph_frag_mask_shift(__u32 f)
> 	return 24 - ceph_frag_bits(f);
> }
> 
> -static inline int ceph_frag_contains_value(__u32 f, __u32 v)
> +static inline bool ceph_frag_contains_value(__u32 f, __u32 v)
> {
> 	return (v & ceph_frag_mask(f)) == ceph_frag_value(f);
> }
> -- 
> 1.9.1

both applied

Thanks
Yan, Zheng

> 
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/