linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: lov: Fix sparse warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 21 Nov 2015 15:09:22 +0000
From:	"Drokin, Oleg" <oleg.drokin@...el.com>
To:	Paul Davies C <pauldaviesc@...il.com>
CC:	"<lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>" <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>,
	"<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"<devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
	"<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: lov: Fix sparse warning

Hello!

On Nov 21, 2015, at 3:26 AM, Paul Davies C wrote:

> This patch fixes the following warnings:-
> 
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_object.c:926:22: warning: symbol 'lov_lsm_get' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_object.c:942:6: warning: symbol 'lov_lsm_put' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Davies C <pauldaviesc@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_object.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_object.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_object.c
> index c7ff817..a667336 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_object.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_object.c
> @@ -923,7 +923,7 @@ static struct lov_stripe_md *lov_lsm_addref(struct lov_object *lov)
> 	return lsm;
> }
> 
> -struct lov_stripe_md *lov_lsm_get(struct cl_object *clobj)
> +static struct lov_stripe_md *lov_lsm_get(struct cl_object *clobj)
> {
> 	struct lu_object *luobj;
> 	struct lov_stripe_md *lsm = NULL;
> @@ -939,7 +939,7 @@ struct lov_stripe_md *lov_lsm_get(struct cl_object *clobj)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(lov_lsm_get);

You did not compile-tested this, did you?
This symbol is still used in lustre/lclient/lcommon_cl.c but also
leaving EXPORT_SYMBOL intact for a static symbol?

> 
> -void lov_lsm_put(struct cl_object *unused, struct lov_stripe_md *lsm)
> +static void lov_lsm_put(struct cl_object *unused, struct lov_stripe_md *lsm)
> {
> 	if (lsm != NULL)
> 		lov_free_memmd(&lsm);
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/