linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: clean up the kbuild tree?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 23 Nov 2015 18:12:31 -0800
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc:	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: clean up the kbuild tree?

> > 5.x is better than 4.x but it's still a slower. It's also not incremential.
> 
> At the last time I tested with the latest 5.x and stock binutils on
> openSUSE Tumbleweed, I failed to build, unfortunately.  Partly the
> detection of gcc version doesn't work for 5.x, and partly something is

Really? It work for me with gcc 5

> missing in binutils side, although it's already built with plugin.

Yes it needs HJ Lu's Linux binutils, not the standard FSF binutils.
The patch to fix LTO with ld -r was submitted to standard binutils, but they
didn't want to fix the issue.


-Andi
-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/