linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 03/13] device property: refactor built-in properties support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 24 Nov 2015 15:37:45 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	Kevin Fenzi <kevin@...ye.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/13] device property: refactor built-in properties support

On Tuesday, November 24, 2015 12:22:49 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Instead of using the type and nval fields we will use length (in bytes) of the
> value. The sanity check is done in the accessors.
> 
> The built-in property accessors are split in the same way such as device tree.

Do I understand correctly that this is indended to make the built-in properties
follow the DT layout?

Thanks,
Rafael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/