linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 07/22] kthread: Detect when a kthread work is used by more workers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 24 Nov 2015 15:56:41 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/22] kthread: Detect when a kthread work is used by
 more workers

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:06:50AM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Mon 2015-11-23 17:27:03, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 02:25:12PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > @@ -610,6 +625,12 @@ repeat:
> > >  	if (work) {
> > >  		__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> > >  		work->func(work);
> > > +
> > > +		spin_lock_irq(&worker->lock);
> > > +		/* Allow to queue the work into another worker */
> > > +		if (!kthread_work_pending(work))
> > > +			work->worker = NULL;
> > > +		spin_unlock_irq(&worker->lock);
> > 
> > Doesn't this mean that the work item can't be freed from its callback?
> > That pattern tends to happen regularly.
> 
> I am not sure if I understand your question. Do you mean switching
> work->func during the life time of the struct kthread_work? This
> should not be affected by the above code.

No, work->func(work) doing: kfree(work).

That is indeed something quite frequently done, and since you now have
references to work after calling func, things would go *boom* rather
quickly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/