linux-kernel - Re: irq_fpu_usable() is irreliable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:41:45 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, mingo@...hat.com,
	hpa@...or.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: irq_fpu_usable() is irreliable


* Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com> wrote:

> Hi Ingo,
> 
> The plot thickens, once again.
> 
> > > Also, what CPU does the test system have, Intel or AMD? The FPU behavior can be
> > > very different in the two cases.
> > Intel 3820QM, but inside VMWare Workstation 12.
> 
> Trying this on bare metal, the problem goes away! Though the VM is 4.2
> and my bare metal is 4.3. Perhaps your recent changes did something.
> 
> But more likely, there's some funny business happening with VMWare.
> Any speculation about this? Fascinating issue...

I have no idea unfortunately :-( You might want to take it up with the vmware 
guys.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/