lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 28 Nov 2015 00:03:55 +0900
From:	Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc:	tony.luck@...el.com, qiuxishi@...wei.com,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, mel@....ul.ie,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, dave.hansen@...el.com,
	matt@...eblueprint.co.uk, Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option

Xeon E7 v3 based systems supports Address Range Mirroring
and UEFI BIOS complied with UEFI spec 2.5 can notify which
ranges are reliable (mirrored) via EFI memory map.
Now Linux kernel utilize its information and allocates
boot time memory from reliable region.

My requirement is:
  - allocate kernel memory from reliable region
  - allocate user memory from non-reliable region

In order to meet my requirement, ZONE_MOVABLE is useful.
By arranging non-reliable range into ZONE_MOVABLE,
reliable memory is only used for kernel allocations.

My idea is to extend existing "kernelcore" option and
introduces kernelcore=reliable option. By specifying
"reliable" instead of specifying the amount of memory,
non-reliable region will be arranged into ZONE_MOVABLE.

Earlier discussions are at:
 https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/9/24
 https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/15/9

For example, suppose 2-nodes system with the following memory
 range:
  node 0 [mem 0x0000000000001000-0x000000109fffffff]
  node 1 [mem 0x00000010a0000000-0x000000209fffffff]

and the following ranges are marked as reliable:
  [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000100000000]
  [0x0000000100000000-0x0000000180000000]
  [0x0000000800000000-0x0000000880000000]
  [0x00000010a0000000-0x0000001120000000]
  [0x00000017a0000000-0x0000001820000000]

If you specify kernelcore=reliable, ZONE_NORMAL and ZONE_MOVABLE
are arranged like bellow:

 - node 0:
  ZONE_NORMAL : [0x0000000100000000-0x00000010a0000000]
  ZONE_MOVABLE: [0x0000000180000000-0x00000010a0000000]
 - node 1:
  ZONE_NORMAL : [0x00000010a0000000-0x00000020a0000000]
  ZONE_MOVABLE: [0x0000001120000000-0x00000020a0000000]

In overlapped range, pages to be ZONE_MOVABLE in ZONE_NORMAL
are treated as absent pages, and vice versa.

v1 -> v2:
 Refine so that the above example case also can be
 handled properly:


Taku Izumi (2):
  mm: Calculate zone_start_pfn at zone_spanned_pages_in_node()
  mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option

 Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt |   9 ++-
 mm/page_alloc.c                     | 140 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

-- 
1.8.3.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ