lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 30 Nov 2015 17:46:29 +0100
From:	Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To:	Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com>
Cc:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
	Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
	Huang Shijie <shijie.huang@...el.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	Gabor Juhos <juhosg@...nwrt.org>,
	"Bean Huo 霍斌斌 (beanhuo)" 
	<beanhuo@...ron.com>, Furquan Shaikh <furquan@...gle.com>,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi/nor: Fix error message with unrecognized JEDEC

On Monday, November 30, 2015 at 04:25:11 PM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
> The error message was:
> 
> m25p80 spi32766.0: unrecognized JEDEC id bytes: 00,  0,  0
> 
> The new error message:
> 
> m25p80 spi32766.0: unrecognized JEDEC id bytes: 00, 00, 00
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> index b7c038c75684..7d2b96d5f350 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> @@ -890,7 +890,7 @@ static const struct flash_info *spi_nor_read_id(struct
> spi_nor *nor) return &spi_nor_ids[tmp];
>  		}
>  	}
> -	dev_err(nor->dev, "unrecognized JEDEC id bytes: %02x, %2x, %2x\n",
> +	dev_err(nor->dev, "unrecognized JEDEC id bytes: %.2x, %.2x, %.2x\n",

You can change it to %02x to make it consistent, no ? What do you think ?

>  		id[0], id[1], id[2]);
>  	return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>  }

Best regards,
Marek Vasut
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ