linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Add online file check feature

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 2 Dec 2015 19:20:12 +0100
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Gang He <ghe@...e.com>
Cc:	mfasheh@...e.com, rgoldwyn@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Add online file check feature

On Wed 2015-10-28 14:25:57, Gang He wrote:
> When there are errors in the ocfs2 filesystem,
> they are usually accompanied by the inode number which caused the error.
> This inode number would be the input to fixing the file.
> One of these options could be considered:
> A file in the sys filesytem which would accept inode numbers.
> This could be used to communication back what has to be fixed or is fixed.
> You could write:
> $# echo "CHECK <inode>" > /sys/fs/ocfs2/devname/filecheck
> or
> $# echo "FIX <inode>" > /sys/fs/ocfs2/devname/filecheck
> 

Are you sure this is reasonable interface? I mean.... sysfs is
supposed to be one value per file. And I don't think its suitable for
running commands.

...or returning back results.
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/