linux-kernel - Re: Unkillable processes due to PTRACE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 3 Dec 2015 21:56:13 +0100
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>,
	syzkaller@...glegroups.com, Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
	Robert Swiecki <swiecki@...gle.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>,
	Julien Tinnes <jln@...gle.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: Unkillable processes due to PTRACE_TRACEME

Hi!

> > >> waitid(P_ALL, 0, {}, WNOHANG|WEXITED|WSTOPPED|WCONTINUED, NULL) = 0
> > >>
> > >> So what should be fixed here? Kernel of distro init?
> > >
> > > waitpid(__WALL) indeed joins these processes.
> 
> Thanks. And I just checked Fedora 22, it doesn't use __WALL too.
> 
> So I think we should change the kernel even if this is not a bug...
> I'll send the patch.
> 
> > > But __WALL can't be used with waitid and Ubuntu init uses waitid...
> 
> Yes, and I never understood why. Perhaps we should change this too.
> 
> > #include <pthread.h>
> > #include <unistd.h>
> > #include <sys/ptrace.h>
> > #include <stdio.h>
> > #include <errno.h>
> > #include <signal.h>
> > #include <sys/types.h>
> > #include <sys/wait.h>
> >
> > void *thr(void *arg) {
> >         ptrace(PTRACE_TRACEME, 0, 0, 0);
> >         return 0;
> > }
> >
> > int main() {
> > int pid = fork();
> >         if (pid == 0) {
> >                 pthread_t th;
> >                 pthread_create(&th, 0, thr, 0);
> >                 sleep(1);
> >                 return 0;
> >         }
> >         siginfo_t info = {};
> >         int status = 0;
> >         int res = waitpid(-1, &status, __WALL);
> >         printf("pid=%d res=%d errno=%d\n", pid, res, errno);
> >         res = waitpid(-1, &status, __WALL);
> >         printf("pid=%d res=%d errno=%d\n", pid, res, errno);
> >         return 0;
> > }
> >
> >
> > However, I need to wait for a particular child and if I change the
> > first waitpid to:
> >
> >         int res = waitpid(pid, &status, __WALL);
> >
> > then it does not terminate.
> > So how can I wait for such child process?
> 
> You can't. This is one of historical oddities. You need to reap the
> traced sub-thread first. And PTRACE_DETACH doesn't work.

If kill -9 does not take out the process, surely that sounds like a
security problem?

I know ptrace is old and tricky and ugly, but ....?

								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/