linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm/page_ref: add tracepoint to track down page reference manipulation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 3 Dec 2015 13:16:58 +0900
From:	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm/page_ref: add tracepoint to track down page
 reference manipulation

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:45:28AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 09:26:04AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 17:28:05 +0900
> > Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:42:25AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 15:33:25 +0900
> > > > Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > >   
> > > > > Steven, is it possible to add tracepoint to inlined fucntion such as
> > > > > get_page() in include/linux/mm.h?  
> > > > 
> > > > I highly recommend against it. The tracepoint code adds a bit of bloat,
> > > > and if you inline it, you add that bloat to every use case. Also, it  
> > > 
> > > Is it worse than adding function call to my own stub function into
> > > inlined function such as get_page(). I implemented it as following.
> > > 
> > > get_page()
> > > {
> > >         atomic_inc()
> > >         stub_get_page()
> > > }
> > > 
> > > stub_get_page() in foo.c
> > > {
> > >         trace_page_ref_get_page()
> > > }
> > 
> > Now you just slowed down the fast path. But what you could do is:
> > 
> > get_page()
> > {
> > 	atomic_inc();
> > 	if (trace_page_ref_get_page_enabled())
> > 		stub_get_page();
> > }
> > 
> > Now that "trace_page_ref_get_page_enabled()" will turn into:
> > 
> > 	if (static_key_false(&__tracepoint_page_ref_get_page.key)) {
> > 
> > which is a jump label (nop when disabled, a jmp when enabled). That's
> > less bloat but doesn't solve the include problem. You still need to add
> > the include of that will cause havoc with other tracepoints.
> 
> Yes, It also has a include dependency problem so I can't use
> trace_page_ref_get_page_enabled() in mm.h. BTW, I tested following
> implementation and it works fine.
> 
> extern struct tracepoint __tracepoint_page_ref_get_page;
> 
> get_page()
> {
>         atomic_inc()
>         if (static_key_false(&__tracepoint_page_ref_get_page.key))
>                 stub_get_page()
> }
> 
> This would not slow down fast path although it can't prevent bloat.
> I know that it isn't good code practice, but, this page reference
> handling functions have complex include dependency so I'm not sure
> I can solve it completely. For this special case, can I use
> this raw data structure?
> 

Steven, any comment?

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/