linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] mfd: tps65912: Driver rewrite with DT support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 4 Dec 2015 08:43:58 +0000
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	"Andrew F. Davis" <afd@...com>
Cc:	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] mfd: tps65912: Driver rewrite with DT support

On Thu, 03 Dec 2015, Andrew F. Davis wrote:

> On 11/24/2015 10:26 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >On Wed, 18 Nov 2015, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
> >
> >>In an effort to cleanup this driver and add Device Tree support
> >>the driver has been rewritten based on new driver styles and
> >>modern kernel driver helpers. This has nearly halved the lines
> >>of code while keeping all previous functionality.
> >>
> >>Platform file based initialization has been dropped as there is
> >>no examples of this use in the kernel.
> >>
> >>v1 can be found here: [1] v2: [2] v3: [3] v4: [4] v5: [5] v6: [6]
> >>
> >>Changes from v6:
> >>  - Removed compatible strings from DT sub-nodes
> >>  - Rearranged DT bindings
> >>  - Small fixes
> >>
> >>Changes from v5:
> >>  - Small formatting changes to DT Docs
> >>  - Converted to_tps65912_gpio from macro to inline function
> >>
> >>Changes from v4:
> >>  - Use mfd core to add sub-devices
> >>
> >>Changes from v3:
> >>  - Reorganized regulator driver and related DT node
> >>  - Other small fixes as discussed in v3 thread
> >>
> >>Changes from v2:
> >>  - Split the series further into subsystems
> >>
> >>Changes from v1:
> >>  - Split the rewrite into delete/create patches
> >>  - Several small fixes as discussed in v1 thread
> >>
> >>[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg93863.html
> >>[2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg95003.html
> >>[3] http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg95133.html
> >>[4] http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg96109.html
> >>[5] http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg100601.html
> >>[6] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/30/690
> >>
> >>Andrew F. Davis (5):
> >>   Documentation: tps65912: Add DT bindings for the TPS65912 PMIC
> >>   mfd: tps65912: Remove old driver in preparation for new driver
> >>   mfd: tps65912: Add driver for the TPS65912 PMIC
> >>   regulator: tps65912: Add regulator driver for the TPS65912 PMIC
> >>   gpio: tps65912: Add GPIO driver for the TPS65912 PMIC
> >>
> >>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/tps65912.txt |  50 ++
> >>  drivers/gpio/Kconfig                               |   2 +-
> >>  drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65912.c                       | 317 ++++-----
> >>  drivers/mfd/Kconfig                                |  20 +-
> >>  drivers/mfd/Makefile                               |   3 +-
> >>  drivers/mfd/tps65912-core.c                        | 290 ++++-----
> >>  drivers/mfd/tps65912-i2c.c                         | 219 +++----
> >>  drivers/mfd/tps65912-irq.c                         | 217 -------
> >>  drivers/mfd/tps65912-spi.c                         | 219 +++----
> >>  drivers/regulator/Kconfig                          |   2 +-
> >>  drivers/regulator/tps65912-regulator.c             | 710 +++++----------------
> >>  include/linux/mfd/tps65912.h                       | 208 +++---
> >
> >Just waiting for the regulator Ack now, right?
> >
> 
> I believe so, is there a friendly way to poke Mark Brown so this doesn't
> get caught in his filter? This is almost identical to the regulator he
> applied the other day from me so I don't imagine there will be much problem
> with this patch.

Just repost the set with all the remaining Acks and explain in the
cover letter that you're only missing one Ack.  I can prod Mark from
that point.

> >>  12 files changed, 780 insertions(+), 1477 deletions(-)
> >>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/tps65912.txt
> >>  rewrite drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65912.c (74%)
> >>  rewrite drivers/mfd/tps65912-core.c (95%)
> >>  rewrite drivers/mfd/tps65912-i2c.c (93%)
> >>  delete mode 100644 drivers/mfd/tps65912-irq.c
> >>  rewrite drivers/mfd/tps65912-spi.c (92%)
> >>  rewrite drivers/regulator/tps65912-regulator.c (94%)
> >>
> >

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/