linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 2/6] acpi: pci: Setup MSI domain for ACPI based pci devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 6 Dec 2015 19:03:18 +0100
From:	Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>
To:	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Cc:	Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>,
	tglx@...utronix.de, jason@...edaemon.net, rjw@...ysocki.net,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
	hanjun.guo@...aro.org, tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org,
	graeme.gregory@...aro.org, dhdang@....com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/6] acpi: pci: Setup MSI domain for ACPI based pci
 devices

Hi Marc,


On 11/22/2015 12:35 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Nov 2015 15:18:45 -0600
> Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Marc,
>>
>> On 11/19/15 06:08, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:47:25 -0700
>>> Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Suravee,
>>>
>>> Sorry it took so long to get to this series. Comments below.
>> No worry.
>>
>>>> This patch introduces pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(), which returns
>>>> the MSI domain of the specified PCI host bridge with DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI
>>>> bus token. Then, it is assigned to pci device.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>>>>    drivers/pci/probe.c    |  2 ++
>>>>    include/linux/pci.h    |  7 +++++++
>>>>    3 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
>>>> index a32ba75..0e21ef4 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
>>>> @@ -9,7 +9,9 @@
>>>>
>>>>    #include <linux/delay.h>
>>>>    #include <linux/init.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
>>>>    #include <linux/pci.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/msi.h>
>>>>    #include <linux/pci_hotplug.h>
>>>>    #include <linux/module.h>
>>>>    #include <linux/pci-aspm.h>
>>>> @@ -689,6 +691,17 @@ static struct acpi_bus_type acpi_pci_bus = {
>>>>    	.cleanup = pci_acpi_cleanup,
>>>>    };
>>>>
>>>> +struct irq_domain *pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	struct irq_domain *dom = NULL;
>>>> +	struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = pci_msi_get_fwnode(&bus->dev);
>>>> +
>>>> +	if (fwnode)
>>>> +		dom = irq_find_matching_fwnode(fwnode,
>>>> +					       DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI);
>>>> +	return dom;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>> Given this, I really question the need for what you define in patch #1
>>> to be standalone. It is only used by ACPI (DT has its own private
>>> helpers), and it is so far unlikely that it will be of any use for
>>> other firmware interfaces.
>>>
>>> My suggestion is to get rid of pci_msi_get_fwnode() and move the
>>> registration helper into this file. That'd be much simpler.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> 	M.
>>>
>> Ok, I'll take care of this. I assume the rest of the patches looks ok.
> I still need to finish going through it (I have minor comments so far
> on some of the other patches), but I want to get the core ACPI stuff in
> shape before doing anything else.
I am trying to do similar thing for GICv3 & ITS, can you please have a look:
http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1510.1/06139.html

Can you please explain what ACPI core changes do you mean?

Regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/