lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 11 Dec 2015 08:34:49 -0600
From:	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:	atull@...nsource.altera.com
Cc:	Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@...us.com>,
	Josh Cartwright <joshc@...com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	monstr@...str.eu, michal.simek@...inx.com,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com, delicious.quinoa@...il.com,
	dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 2/7] fpga: add bindings document for fpga area

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 05:37:04PM -0600, atull@...nsource.altera.com wrote:
> From: Alan Tull <atull@...nsource.altera.com>
> 
> New bindings document for FPGA Area for reprogramming
> FPGA's under Device Tree control
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alan Tull <atull@...nsource.altera.com>
> ---
> v9:  initial version added to this patchset
> v10: s/fpga/FPGA/g
>      replace DT overlay example with slightly more complicated example
>      move to staging/simple-fpga-bus
> v11: No change in this patch for v11 of the patch set
> v12: Moved out of staging.
>      Changed to use FPGA bridges framework instead of resets
>      for bridges.
> v13: bridge@...f20000 -> bridge@...00000, etc
>      Leave out directly talking about overlays
>      Remove regs and clocks directly under simple-fpga-bus in example
>      Use common "firmware-name" binding instead of "fpga-firmware"
> v14: Use firmware-name in bindings description
>      Call it FPGA Area
>      Remove bindings that specify FPGA Manager and FPGA Bridges
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/fpga/fpga-area.txt         |   70 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 70 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fpga/fpga-area.txt
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fpga/fpga-area.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fpga/fpga-area.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..d656e35
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fpga/fpga-area.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
> +FPGA Area
> +=========
> +
> +A FPGA Area details information about a section of an FPGA including the FPGA
> +image needed to program it and the hardware contained in this section of the
> +FPGA once it is programmed.
> +
> +A FPGA Area corresponds to the whole FPGA in the case of full reconfiguration
> +or a section of a FPGA in the case of partial reconfiguration.
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible : should contain "fpga-area"

I'm not too sure about this. I think this needs to be FPGA specfic.

> +- #address-cells, #size-cells, ranges: must be present to handle address space
> +  mapping for children.
> +
> +Optional properties:
> +- firmware-name : should contain the name of a FPGA image file located on the
> +  firmware search path.
> +- partial-reconfig : boolean property should be defined if partial
> +  reconfiguration of the FPGA is to be done, otherwise full reconfiguration
> +  is done.
> +
> +Example:
> +
> +/dts-v1/;
> +/plugin/;
> +/ {
> +	fragment@0 {
> +		target-path="/soc/fpgamgr@...ridge@0";

Does the bus really go thru the fpgamgr and then the bridge as this 
implies? Or fpgamgr is a sideband controller? For example purposes, it 
would be better to show this not as an overlay so I get the complete 
picture.

Unit addresses of 0 look a bit questionable as I'd expect these to be 
addresses.

> +		__overlay__ {
> +			#address-cells = <1>;
> +	                #size-cells = <1>;
> +
> +			bridge@...00000 {

2 levels of bridge devices/buses?

There is nothing programmable for this bridge? clocks, resets, etc.?

> +				compatible = "fpga-area";
> +
> +				#address-cells = <2>;
> +				#size-cells = <1>;
> +
> +				ranges = <0 0x00000000 0xc0000000 0x00010000>,
> +					 <1 0x00020000 0xff220000 0x00000008>,
> +					 <1 0x00010040 0xff210040 0x00000020>;
> +
> +				firmware-name = "soc_system.rbf";
> +
> +				onchip_memory2_0: memory@...000000 {
> +					device_type = "memory";
> +					compatible = "altr,onchipmem-15.1";
> +					reg = <0 0x00000000 0x00010000>;
> +				};
> +
> +				jtag_uart: serial@...020000 {
> +					compatible = "altr,juart-1.0";
> +					reg = <1 0x00020000 0x00000008>;
> +					interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
> +					interrupts = <0 42 4>;
> +				};
> +
> +				led_pio: gpio@...010040 {
> +					compatible = "altr,pio-1.0";
> +					reg = <1 0x00010040 0x00000020>;
> +					altr,gpio-bank-width = <4>;
> +					#gpio-cells = <2>;
> +					gpio-controller;
> +				};
> +			};
> +		};
> +	};
> +};
> +
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ