[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2015 17:20:57 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>, kbuild-all@...org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
Niklas Söderlund
<niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: allow building emev2 without slave mode again
Hi Arnd,
thanks for looking into this, but I don't get your point yet.
> The slave_cb callback function is supposed to set the 'value'
> here,
Only if a master wants to READ from us.
> but it might return an error not assign the pointer,
An error is only returned if a WRITE from a master was not accepted by
the slave backend.
> It might be best to change the callback to return 'void' and not
> allow it to fail.
We need that because in case of an errno, the slave should send NACK to
the master instead of ACK.
> At least the eeprom slave cannot fail anyway, and it is the only
> implementation we have at the moment.
True. But giving a slave the possibility to NACK a write should be
present IMO.
> Alternatively, the inline could return an error, and both bus
> drivers check for the error before using 'value'.
Hum, it does return an error?
return client->slave_cb(client, event, val);
You probably mean something else?
Regards,
Wolfram
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists