| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 15:15:02 +0800
From: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...ux.intel.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com>,
pbonzini@...hat.com
Cc: gleb@...nel.org, mtosatti@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] KVM: page track: introduce
kvm_page_track_{add,remove}_page
On 12/01/2015 02:26 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> These two functions are the user APIs:
> - kvm_page_track_add_page(): add the page to the tracking pool after
> that later specified access on that page will be tracked
>
> - kvm_page_track_remove_page(): remove the page from the tracking pool,
> the specified access on the page is not tracked after the last user is
> gone
>
> Both of these are called under the protection of kvm->srcu or
> kvm->slots_lock
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h | 5 ++
> arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 100 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
> index 347d5c9..9cc17c6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
> @@ -10,4 +10,9 @@ int kvm_page_track_create_memslot(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> unsigned long npages);
> void kvm_page_track_free_memslot(struct kvm_memory_slot *free,
> struct kvm_memory_slot *dont);
> +
> +void kvm_page_track_add_page(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn,
> + enum kvm_page_track_mode mode);
> +void kvm_page_track_remove_page(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn,
> + enum kvm_page_track_mode mode);
> #endif
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c b/arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c
> index 0338d36..ad510db 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c
> @@ -56,3 +56,98 @@ void kvm_page_track_free_memslot(struct kvm_memory_slot *free,
> if (!dont || free->arch.gfn_track != dont->arch.gfn_track)
> page_track_slot_free(free);
> }
> +
> +static bool check_mode(enum kvm_page_track_mode mode)
> +{
> + if (mode < 0 || mode >= KVM_PAGE_TRACK_MAX)
> + return false;
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static void update_gfn_track(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
> + enum kvm_page_track_mode mode, int count)
> +{
> + int index, val;
> +
> + index = gfn_to_index(gfn, slot->base_gfn, PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL);
> +
> + slot->arch.gfn_track[mode][index] += count;
> + val = slot->arch.gfn_track[mode][index];
> + WARN_ON(val < 0);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * add guest page to the tracking pool so that corresponding access on that
> + * page will be intercepted.
> + *
> + * It should be called under the protection of kvm->srcu or kvm->slots_lock
> + *
> + * @kvm: the guest instance we are interested in.
> + * @gfn: the guest page.
> + * @mode: tracking mode, currently only write track is supported.
> + */
> +void kvm_page_track_add_page(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn,
> + enum kvm_page_track_mode mode)
> +{
> + struct kvm_memslots *slots;
> + struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
> + int i;
> +
> + WARN_ON(!check_mode(mode));
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < KVM_ADDRESS_SPACE_NUM; i++) {
> + slots = __kvm_memslots(kvm, i);
> + slot = __gfn_to_memslot(slots, gfn);
> +
> + spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> + update_gfn_track(slot, gfn, mode, 1);
> +
> + /*
> + * new track stops large page mapping for the
> + * tracked page.
> + */
> + kvm_mmu_gfn_disallow_lpage(slot, gfn);
Where is kvm_mmu_gfn_disallow_lpage? Neither did I see it in your patch
nor in my own latest KVM repo without your patch :)
> +
> + if (mode == KVM_PAGE_TRACK_WRITE)
> + if (kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_write_protect(kvm, slot, gfn))
> + kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
Neither can I find kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_write_protect. Did I miss something?
Thanks,
-Kai
> + spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * remove the guest page from the tracking pool which stops the interception
> + * of corresponding access on that page. It is the opposed operation of
> + * kvm_page_track_add_page().
> + *
> + * It should be called under the protection of kvm->srcu or kvm->slots_lock
> + *
> + * @kvm: the guest instance we are interested in.
> + * @gfn: the guest page.
> + * @mode: tracking mode, currently only write track is supported.
> + */
> +void kvm_page_track_remove_page(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn,
> + enum kvm_page_track_mode mode)
> +{
> + struct kvm_memslots *slots;
> + struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
> + int i;
> +
> + WARN_ON(!check_mode(mode));
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < KVM_ADDRESS_SPACE_NUM; i++) {
> + slots = __kvm_memslots(kvm, i);
> + slot = __gfn_to_memslot(slots, gfn);
> +
> + spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> + update_gfn_track(slot, gfn, mode, -1);
> +
> + /*
> + * allow large page mapping for the tracked page
> + * after the tracker is gone.
> + */
> + kvm_mmu_gfn_allow_lpage(slot, gfn);
> + spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> + }
> +}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists