linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 12/19] ARM: dts: exynos: replace legacy *,wakeup property with wakeup-source

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 17 Dec 2015 08:38:03 +0900
From:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To:	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/19] ARM: dts: exynos: replace legacy *,wakeup property
 with wakeup-source

On 16.12.2015 19:32, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> 
> 
> On 15/12/15 23:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 16.12.2015 01:35, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 21/10/15 11:10, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>>> Though the keyboard and other driver will continue to support the
>>>> legacy
>>>> "gpio-key,wakeup", "linux-keypad,wakeup" boolean property to enable the
>>>> wakeup source, "wakeup-source" is the new standard binding.
>>>>
>>>> This patch replaces all the legacy wakeup properties with the unified
>>>> "wakeup-source" property in order to avoid any futher copy-paste
>>>> duplication.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>
>>>> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
>>>
>>> Ping, do you prefer taking via your tree or should I send to armsoc
>>> directly ?
>>
>> Usually it depends on the dependencies... but:
>> 1. I just received this patch - 12/19.
> 
> Sorry for that. The initial idea was to show all the changes but merge
> the binding and dependencies first, so didn't cc all.
> 
>> 2. No cover letter, no other patches, no explanation about any
>> dependencies or other related changes. Nothing. Just one patch.
> 
> Yes this was initially posted as part of the series, but only
> dependencies were merged for v4.4
> 
>> 3. The patch mentions new standard binding. Was the new binding already
>> merged? Or is it part of these series? What about backward compatibility?
> 
> Not a brand new binding, but made existing one a standard so that we
> don't continue to be creative and generate more bindings for the same
> thing. Yes binding and dependent patches are already in mainline. And
> yes backward compatibility is maintained as mentioned in the commit
> message.

That explains everything, thanks. We'll take it through samsung-soc,
just give me some time for review.

As for other patch - the s5pv210 - I did not get it directly but I think
I can find it on list subscription archives.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/