linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] locking/osq: fix ordering of node initialisation in osq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 17 Dec 2015 09:48:42 +0000
From:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To:	David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>
Cc:	peterz@...radead.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, andrew.pinski@...iumnetworks.com,
	dbueso@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/osq: fix ordering of node initialisation in
 osq_lock

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 05:18:48PM -0800, David Daney wrote:
> What is the status of this patch?  It there a good likelihood that it will
> make it into v4.4?
> 
> If not, we should request that c55a6ffa6285 ("locking/osq: Relax atomic
> semantics") be reverted for v4.4

I think Peter was going to send it to mingo as an urgent fix, but I've
not seen anything from the tip-bot yet.

Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/