[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 07:29:26 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blackfin-cpufreq: Change return type of cpu_set_cclk()
to that of clk_set_rate()
On 18-12-15, 20:07, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 19:43:27 +0100
>
> The return type "unsigned long" was used by the cpu_set_cclk() function
> while the type "int" is provided by the clk_set_rate() function.
> Let us make this usage consistent.
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c
> index a9f8e5b..2a6f3ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/blackfin-cpufreq.c
> @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static unsigned int bfin_getfreq_khz(unsigned int cpu)
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_BF60x
> -unsigned long cpu_set_cclk(int cpu, unsigned long new)
> +int cpu_set_cclk(int cpu, unsigned long new)
> {
> struct clk *clk;
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists