lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 06:40:07 +0100 From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com> To: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Darren Hart <darren@...art.com>, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>, Bhuvanesh_Surachari@...tor.com, Andy Lowe <Andy_Lowe@...tor.com> Subject: Re: [patch 5/5] futex: Cleanup the goto confusion in requeue_pi() On Sat, 2015-12-19 at 21:15 -0800, Darren Hart wrote: > As a follow-on, I think it might be worthwhile to create a symmetrical > get_pi_state() to the put_pi_state(), rather than handling the atomic_inc > directly. Ditto, immediate thought was future auditors will look for it. -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists