linux-kernel - RE: [char-misc-next 4/7] watchdog: mei

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 20 Dec 2015 11:54:42 +0000
From:	"Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>
CC:	"Usyskin, Alexander" <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>,
	"linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [char-misc-next 4/7] watchdog: mei_wdt: add status debugfs entry



> >>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)
> >>> +static const char *mei_wdt_state_str(enum mei_wdt_state state)
> >>> +{
> >>> +	switch (state) {
> >>> +	case MEI_WDT_IDLE: return "IDLE";
> >>> +	case MEI_WDT_START: return "START";
> >>> +	case MEI_WDT_RUNNING: return "RUNNING";
> >>> +	case MEI_WDT_STOPPING: return "STOPPING";
> >>> +	default: return "unknown";
> >>
> >> Doesn't this cause checkpatch warnings ?
> > It doesn't and also checkpatch.pl  is just a help tool.
> 
> I should have said "Doesn't this violate the single-statement-per-line"
> coding style rule, but I guess then you'd argue that "case xxx:" is not
> a statement.

I believe it is reasonably readable , but I don't have a strong feeling about it, if you do I can change it.

Tomas 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/