| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 01:50:54 +0000
From: "Wu, Feng" <feng.wu@...el.com>
To: Yang Zhang <yang.zhang.wz@...il.com>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"rkrcmar@...hat.com" <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
CC: "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Wu, Feng" <feng.wu@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: x86: Use vector-hashing to deliver
lowest-priority interrupts
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yang Zhang [mailto:yang.zhang.wz@...il.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 9:46 AM
> To: Wu, Feng <feng.wu@...el.com>; pbonzini@...hat.com;
> rkrcmar@...hat.com
> Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: x86: Use vector-hashing to deliver lowest-
> priority interrupts
>
> On 2015/12/16 9:37, Feng Wu wrote:
> > Use vector-hashing to deliver lowest-priority interrupts, As an
> > example, modern Intel CPUs in server platform use this method to
> > handle lowest-priority interrupts.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@...el.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kvm/irq_comm.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++-----
> > arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 57
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h | 2 ++
> > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 9 ++++++++
> > arch/x86/kvm/x86.h | 1 +
> > 5 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/irq_comm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/irq_comm.c
> > index 84b96d3..c8c5f61 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/irq_comm.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/irq_comm.c
> > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
> > #include "ioapic.h"
> >
> > #include "lapic.h"
> > +#include "x86.h"
> >
> > static int kvm_set_pic_irq(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e,
> > struct kvm *kvm, int irq_source_id, int level,
> > @@ -53,8 +54,10 @@ static int kvm_set_ioapic_irq(struct
> kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e,
> > int kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_lapic *src,
> > struct kvm_lapic_irq *irq, unsigned long *dest_map)
> > {
> > - int i, r = -1;
> > + int i, r = -1, idx = 0;
> > struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, *lowest = NULL;
> > + unsigned long dest_vcpu_bitmap[BITS_TO_LONGS(KVM_MAX_VCPUS)];
> > + unsigned int dest_vcpus = 0;
> >
> > if (irq->dest_mode == 0 && irq->dest_id == 0xff &&
> > kvm_lowest_prio_delivery(irq)) {
> > @@ -65,6 +68,8 @@ int kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic(struct kvm *kvm, struct
> kvm_lapic *src,
> > if (kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic_fast(kvm, src, irq, &r, dest_map))
> > return r;
> >
> > + memset(dest_vcpu_bitmap, 0, sizeof(dest_vcpu_bitmap));
> > +
> > kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
> > if (!kvm_apic_present(vcpu))
> > continue;
> > @@ -78,13 +83,25 @@ int kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic(struct kvm *kvm, struct
> kvm_lapic *src,
> > r = 0;
> > r += kvm_apic_set_irq(vcpu, irq, dest_map);
> > } else if (kvm_lapic_enabled(vcpu)) {
> > - if (!lowest)
> > - lowest = vcpu;
> > - else if (kvm_apic_compare_prio(vcpu, lowest) < 0)
> > - lowest = vcpu;
> > + if (!kvm_vector_hashing_enabled()) {
> > + if (!lowest)
> > + lowest = vcpu;
> > + else if (kvm_apic_compare_prio(vcpu, lowest) <
> 0)
> > + lowest = vcpu;
> > + } else {
> > + __set_bit(vcpu->vcpu_id, dest_vcpu_bitmap);
> > + dest_vcpus++;
> > + }
> > }
> > }
> >
> > + if (dest_vcpus != 0) {
> > + idx = kvm_vector_2_index(irq->vector, dest_vcpus,
> > + dest_vcpu_bitmap, KVM_MAX_VCPUS);
> > +
> > + lowest = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, idx - 1);
> > + }
> > +
> > if (lowest)
> > r = kvm_apic_set_irq(lowest, irq, dest_map);
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> > index ecd4ea1..e29001f 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> > @@ -678,6 +678,22 @@ bool kvm_apic_match_dest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct kvm_lapic *source,
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +int kvm_vector_2_index(u32 vector, u32 dest_vcpus,
> > + const unsigned long *bitmap, u32 bitmap_size)
> > +{
> > + u32 mod;
> > + int i, idx = 0;
> > +
> > + mod = vector % dest_vcpus;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i <= mod; i++) {
> > + idx = find_next_bit(bitmap, bitmap_size, idx) + 1;
> > + BUG_ON(idx > bitmap_size);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return idx;
> > +}
> > +
> > bool kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic_fast(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_lapic *src,
> > struct kvm_lapic_irq *irq, int *r, unsigned long *dest_map)
> > {
> > @@ -731,17 +747,38 @@ bool kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic_fast(struct kvm
> *kvm, struct kvm_lapic *src,
> > dst = map->logical_map[cid];
> >
> > if (kvm_lowest_prio_delivery(irq)) {
> > - int l = -1;
> > - for_each_set_bit(i, &bitmap, 16) {
> > - if (!dst[i])
> > - continue;
> > - if (l < 0)
> > - l = i;
> > - else if (kvm_apic_compare_prio(dst[i]->vcpu,
> dst[l]->vcpu) < 0)
> > - l = i;
> > + if (!kvm_vector_hashing_enabled()) {
> > + int l = -1;
> > + for_each_set_bit(i, &bitmap, 16) {
> > + if (!dst[i])
> > + continue;
> > + if (l < 0)
> > + l = i;
> > + else if (kvm_apic_compare_prio(dst[i]-
> >vcpu, dst[l]->vcpu) < 0)
> > + l = i;
> > + }
> > + bitmap = (l >= 0) ? 1 << l : 0;
> > + } else {
> > + int idx = 0;
> > + unsigned int dest_vcpus = 0;
> > +
> > + for_each_set_bit(i, &bitmap, 16) {
> > + if (!dst[i]
> && !kvm_lapic_enabled(dst[i]->vcpu)) {
>
> It should be or(||) not and (&&).
Oh, you are right! My negligence! Thanks for pointing this out, Yang!
Thanks,
Feng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists