linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 1/1] efi: a misc char interface for user to update efi firmware

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 21 Dec 2015 17:45:59 +0000
From:	Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.logic@...us-software.ie>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:	"Kweh, Hock Leong" <hock.leong.kweh@...el.com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
	Ong Boon Leong <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
	Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>,
	Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Roy Franz <roy.franz@...aro.org>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
	Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Anvin H Peter <h.peter.anvin@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/1] efi: a misc char interface for user to update
 efi firmware

On Mon, 2015-12-21 at 18:37 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 05:04:11PM +0000, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> > > This patch also export efi_capsule_supported() function symbol
> > > for
> > > verifying the submitted capsule header in this kernel module.
> > 
> > 1. Should be a separate patch 
> > 2. Suggested, rewording for that patch log
> > 
> > 2/2 Title
> > This patch exports efi_capsule_supported to enable verification of
> > the
> > capsule header.
> > 
> > That said - who is the user of this symbol ? Why is it needed ?
> > Anyway
> > please consider splitting and rewording.
> 
> Huh?
> 
> I still don't really see the reasoning for splitting out the export.
> 
> When you do the export and use it in a single patch it is *obvious*
> why
> it is being exported.
> 
> And there's no need to mention in the commit message that you're
> exporting a symbol. People export symbols all the time.
> 

Yes - saw the export down the end of the patchset. Feel free to ignore
that comment.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/