linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cgroup tree with the tip tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 20 Dec 2015 23:48:54 -0500
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cgroup tree with the tip tree

On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 03:41:19PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Tejun,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the cgroup tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   init/Kconfig
> 
> between commits:
> 
>   257372262056 ("x86/intel_rdt: Add support for Cache Allocation detection")
>   5ad9144cdb9a ("x86,cgroup/intel_rdt : Add a cgroup interface to manage Intel cache allocation")

Ingo, can you please revert the rdt cgroup.  I still don't think this
is the right approach and tglx's new proposal seems a lot better.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/