linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Patch series to make lustre safe(r) for W=1 compiles

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 21 Dec 2015 15:43:54 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>
Cc:	oleg.drokin@...el.com, andreas.dilger@...el.com,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Patch series to make lustre safe(r) for W=1
 compiles

On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 06:04:19PM -0500, Valdis Kletnieks wrote:
> Start of a batch series to clean up the Lustre tree. Other people have
> done some sparse and checkpatch cleanups, but I found a bunch of
> stuff building with W=1. There's probably more, but this was the
> really low-hanging obvious fruit.
> 
> Valdis Kletnieks (6):
>   staging/lustre: Silence warning about 'inline'
>   staging/lustre: Fix set-but-unused whinge.
>   staging/lustre: Clean up another C warnining: set but not used
>   staging/lustre: Fix another C compiler whine: set but not used
>   staging/lustre: Nuke an unsigned >= 0 assert
>   staging/lustre: Nuke another unsigned >= 0 assert

These subject names don't match what you actually sent out, the 'prefix'
got stripped.  Please resend them all so that I can properly apply them.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/