linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Improve drm_of_component

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 23 Dec 2015 11:33:27 +1000
From:	Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
To:	Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>
Cc:	Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
	Mark Yao <mark.yao@...k-chips.com>,
	Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>,
	linux-rockchip <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Improve drm_of_component_probe() and move rockchip
 to use it

On 23 December 2015 at 03:38, Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 02:22:03PM +0000, Liviu Dudau wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> This is v2 of the patchset trying to make drm_of_component_probe() cope with finding
>> both local crtc ports and remote encoder ones. Heiko Stübner was nice enough to test
>> an earlier version that was patched following Russell's suggestions on rk3288, but
>> I haven't seen any reports from iMX or Armada users.
>>
>> Changelog:
>>  v2: Updated the drm_of_component_probe() comment to explain why the reference count
>>      is not dropped. Fixed the compare_port() function for rockchip as described by
>>      Russell.
>>  v1: Original submission. http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2015-November/094546.html
>
> Gentle ping, this has now been tested by Rockchip people and fixes the earlier version
> that had to be reverted in mainline. Can it be included in the -next somewhere?

It would be good to get Russell ack on the first one, especially after
reading the previous thread.

Dave.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/