linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm, oom: introduce oom reaper

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 25 Dec 2015 12:44:29 +0100
From:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:	Ross Zwisler <zwisler@...il.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Andrea Argangeli <andrea@...nel.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm, oom: introduce oom reaper

On Fri 25-12-15 12:35:37, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> Thanks I will try to reproduce early next year. But so far I think this
> is just a general issue of MADV_DONTNEED vs. truncate and oom_reaper is
> just lucky to trigger it. There shouldn't be anything oom_reaper
> specific here. Maybe there is some additional locking missing?

Hmm, scratch that. I think Tetsuo has nailed it. It seems like
the missing initialization of details structure during unmap
is the culprit. So there most probably was on OOM killing
invoked. It is just a side effect of the patch and missing
http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=145068666428057 follow up fix.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/