linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] lib/vsprintf: refactor duplicate code to xnumber()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 28 Dec 2015 23:20:54 +0100
From:	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] lib/vsprintf: refactor duplicate code to xnumber()

On Mon, Dec 28 2015, Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk> wrote:

>
> Is there any aspect of the passed-through printf_spec which isn't
> overridden in xnumber? The users are/will be various %p extensions,
> which probably means that no-one passes a non-default precision (gcc
> complains about %.*p), and the remaining possible flags (PLUS, LEFT,
> SPACE) are useless and/or impossible to pass to %p

Actually, LEFT can be passed to %p (or get set by passing a negative
field width via %*p), which would be actively harmful: When LEFT is set,
number() explicitly removes the ZEROPAD flag, so we'd get "0xabcdef  "
instead of "0x00abcdef".
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/