| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 14:17:51 -0500 From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org> To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> Cc: Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>, "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>, jcm@...hat.com, helgaas@...nel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 1/2] ACPI, PCI, irq: remove interrupt count restriction On 12/30/2015 8:28 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Yep, I meant not to use an additional variable. > >> > BTW, I suggest you spend some time around checkpatch for contributions. I could >> > have caught most of the issues you are generally concerned before submitting a patch. > Is it a question? It is a request not a question. I hate wasting your time and my time with things that I could have fixed before submitting a patch. I ran the checkpatch and it said I'm good to go. But, obviously I'm not. -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists