[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 19:08:23 -0600
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge.hallyn@...ntu.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] is_global_init() called on global init sub-thread
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 03:25:42PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> re-upping https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2013-December/msg00086.html
>
> Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> :Because is_global_init() is only true for the main thread of /sbin/init.
> :
> :Just look at oom_unkillable_task(). It tries to not kill init. But, say,
> :select_bad_process() can happily find a sub-thread of is_global_init()
> :and still kill it.
>
> this is still the case, isn't it? at least in some -stable kernels.
> is there (or was there) any reason this change has never been committed?
> (I'm particularly interested in is_global_init()).
... seems like it makes sense. Can you remind us which init you're having
to deal with?
> static inline int is_global_init(struct task_struct *tsk)
> {
> - return tsk->pid == 1;
> + return task_tgid_nr(tsk) == 1;
> }
>
> -ss
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists