[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <568A4405.50807@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 10:05:57 +0000
From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
To: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@...org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
patches@...aro.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@...bosch.com>,
Daniel Drake <drake@...lessm.com>,
Dmitry Pervushin <dpervushin@...il.com>,
Tim Sander <tim@...eglstein.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4-rc5 v22 4/4] ARM: Allow IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE to exploit
FIQ
On 20/12/15 22:52, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> [auto build test ERROR on v4.4-rc5]
> [also build test ERROR on next-20151218]
> [cannot apply to tip/irq/core]
>
> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Daniel-Thompson/irq-arm-Use-FIQ-for-NMI-backtrace-when-possible/20151221-045854
> config: arm-socfpga_defconfig (attached as .config)
> reproduce:
> wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> make.cross ARCH=arm
>
> All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> In file included from include/uapi/linux/stddef.h:1:0,
> from include/linux/stddef.h:4,
> from include/uapi/linux/posix_types.h:4,
> from include/uapi/linux/types.h:13,
> from include/linux/types.h:5,
> from include/linux/list.h:4,
> from include/linux/module.h:9,
> from arch/arm/kernel/smp.c:10:
> arch/arm/kernel/smp.c: In function 'raise_nmi':
>>> include/linux/compiler.h:484:38: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_766' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: SMP_IPI_FIQ_MASK != BIT(IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE)
> _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __LINE__)
> ^
> include/linux/compiler.h:467:4: note: in definition of macro '__compiletime_assert'
> prefix ## suffix(); \
> ^
> include/linux/compiler.h:484:2: note: in expansion of macro '_compiletime_assert'
> _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __LINE__)
> ^
> include/linux/bug.h:50:37: note: in expansion of macro 'compiletime_assert'
> #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
> ^
> include/linux/bug.h:74:2: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG'
> BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition)
> ^
>>> arch/arm/kernel/smp.c:766:2: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON'
> BUILD_BUG_ON(SMP_IPI_FIQ_MASK != BIT(IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE));
This should be a false alarm or at least, the BUILD_BUG_ON() is doing
exactly what it was intended to.
I forgot to mention it in the covering letter (and will fix next time)
but my patchset requires a fix from Marc Zyngier which changes the
numeric value of IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE[1].
Daniel.
1: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/464985
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists