| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 08:00:35 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, lkp@...org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp] [rcu] b8084f70e0: No primary result change, 1414.7%
unixbench.time.involuntary_context_switches
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 12:25:55PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
> "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 10:47:43AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> >> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
> >>
> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-rt-devel.git for-kbuild-bot/current-stable
> >> commit b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54 ("rcu: Eliminate softirq processing from rcutree")
> >
> > This is a performance degradation, correct? If so, looks like this commit
> > is not ready for mainline unless set up to be configured on only for
> > -rt workloads.
>
> Yes. This is a performance degradation.
Thank you!
> > Or am I missing the plot somewhere here?
>
> Which plot?
Apologies, that was American slang, not so appropriate for this audience.
I am asking the -rt guys if there is some problem with adjusting the
patch so that it eliminates softirq only when the kernel is specifically
build/booted for -rt.
Thanx, Paul
> Best Regards,
> Huang, Ying
>
> > Thanx, Paul
> >
> >> =========================================================================================
> >> compiler/cpufreq_governor/kconfig/nr_task/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase:
> >> gcc-4.9/performance/x86_64-rhel/1/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/lkp-ivb-d02/fsbuffer/unixbench
> >>
> >> commit:
> >> ee644236a506642e20637f954d286f49a76ed83a
> >> b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54
> >>
> >> ee644236a506642e b8084f70e028697b342d6388b2
> >> ---------------- --------------------------
> >> %stddev %change %stddev
> >> \ | \
> >> 257.25 18% +1414.7% 3896 13% unixbench.time.involuntary_context_switches
> >> 4425148 22% -61.9% 1684712 29% cpuidle.C1E-IVB.time
> >> 83.75 48% +91.6% 160.50 31% cpuidle.POLL.usage
> >> 1902 7% -12.0% 1674 1% slabinfo.anon_vma.active_objs
> >> 1902 7% -12.0% 1674 1% slabinfo.anon_vma.num_objs
> >> 257.25 18% +1414.7% 3896 13% time.involuntary_context_switches
> >> 8.15 6% -14.1% 7.00 1% time.user_time
> >> 34345 14% -33.3% 22908 33% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.exec_clock.2
> >> 34987 13% -19.7% 28093 15% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.exec_clock.max
> >> 642.75 5% +59.6% 1025 55% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.exec_clock.min
> >> 14639 13% -21.8% 11443 16% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.exec_clock.stddev
> >> 127.75 16% -26.2% 94.25 25% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.load_avg.3
> >> 38865 12% -36.0% 24885 34% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.min_vruntime.2
> >> 39385 12% -22.8% 30395 16% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.min_vruntime.max
> >> 1090 11% +45.3% 1584 32% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.min_vruntime.min
> >> 16286 13% -25.1% 12200 18% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.min_vruntime.stddev
> >> 2.00 0% -50.0% 1.00 0% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.nr_spread_over.0
> >> 2.00 0% -50.0% 1.00 0% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.nr_spread_over.max
> >> 0.87 0% -42.3% 0.50 0% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.nr_spread_over.stddev
> >> 28.50 62% +338.6% 125.00 114% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.runnable_load_avg.1
> >> 16286 13% -25.1% 12200 18% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.spread0.stddev
> >> 127.75 16% -26.0% 94.50 25% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.tg_load_avg_contrib.3
> >> 626662 5% -13.2% 544121 9% sched_debug.cpu.avg_idle.0
> >> 20.25 28% +419.8% 105.25 132% sched_debug.cpu.cpu_load[3].1
> >> 692.40 7% -15.2% 586.96 9% sched_debug.cpu.curr->pid.avg
> >> 36187 12% -31.5% 24793 29% sched_debug.cpu.nr_load_updates.2
> >> 15625 11% +61.6% 25245 23% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.0
> >> 20008 4% +14.1% 22828 4% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.avg
> >> 23333 8% +40.9% 32872 18% sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.0
> >> 21974 4% +12.7% 24771 4% sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.avg
> >> 31771 9% +22.6% 38942 5% sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.max
> >> 9514 28% +75.8% 16728 7% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.0
> >> 4323 10% +40.6% 6080 30% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.2
> >> 10068 4% +15.6% 11639 4% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.avg
> >> 4101 10% +21.7% 4990 8% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.min
> >> 3676 21% +102.5% 7443 8% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.0
> >> 2014 15% +43.2% 2884 10% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.2
> >> 3508 1% +24.8% 4377 4% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.avg
> >> 5554 19% +34.0% 7444 8% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.max
> >> 1846 16% +40.2% 2588 6% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.min
> >>
> >> =========================================================================================
> >> compiler/cpufreq_governor/kconfig/nr_task/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase:
> >> gcc-4.9/performance/x86_64-rhel/1/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/lkp-ivb-d02/fsdisk/unixbench
> >>
> >> commit:
> >> ee644236a506642e20637f954d286f49a76ed83a
> >> b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54
> >>
> >> ee644236a506642e b8084f70e028697b342d6388b2
> >> ---------------- --------------------------
> >> fail:runs %reproduction fail:runs
> >> | | |
> >> :4 25% 1:4 kmsg.DHCP/BOOTP:Reply_not_for_us,op[#]xid[#]
> >> %stddev %change %stddev
> >> \ | \
> >> 265.75 18% +1313.4% 3756 9% unixbench.time.involuntary_context_switches
> >> 659.50 6% +16.5% 768.00 7% slabinfo.kmalloc-512.num_objs
> >> 265.75 18% +1313.4% 3756 9% time.involuntary_context_switches
> >> 5911312 13% -55.9% 2606719 10% cpuidle.C1E-IVB.time
> >> 95195 172% +815.7% 871684 140% cpuidle.POLL.time
> >> 51.75 10% -30.9% 35.75 24% cpuidle.POLL.usage
> >> 13361 22% -27.0% 9754 4% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.exec_clock.stddev
> >> 14632 24% -28.1% 10524 5% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.min_vruntime.stddev
> >> 14632 24% -28.1% 10524 5% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.spread0.stddev
> >> 197.25 14% +52.9% 301.50 41% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.util_avg.0
> >> 552666 8% -7.7% 510200 7% sched_debug.cpu.avg_idle.1
> >> 13610 30% +59.7% 21734 7% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.0
> >> 21145 1% +12.3% 23752 7% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.avg
> >> 10105 21% +62.1% 16380 7% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.min
> >> 11293 28% -44.4% 6276 16% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.stddev
> >> 21314 19% +38.1% 29437 5% sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.0
> >> 11261 22% +57.2% 17703 9% sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.min
> >> 11158 27% -36.7% 7068 12% sched_debug.cpu.sched_count.stddev
> >> 5854 35% +57.0% 9194 8% sched_debug.cpu.sched_goidle.0
> >> 3713 27% +68.4% 6253 11% sched_debug.cpu.sched_goidle.min
> >> 5638 29% -44.5% 3131 18% sched_debug.cpu.sched_goidle.stddev
> >> 8286 32% +85.0% 15333 15% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.0
> >> 10697 1% +13.2% 12107 7% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.avg
> >> 4845 5% +17.8% 5707 8% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_count.min
> >> 2886 47% +105.5% 5931 16% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.0
> >> 3667 3% +17.0% 4291 1% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.avg
> >> 2127 17% +29.2% 2748 7% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.min
> >>
> >>
> >> lkp-ivb-d02: Ivy Bridge
> >> Memory: 8G
> >>
> >> unixbench.time.involuntary_context_switches
> >>
> >> 5000 ++-------------------------------------------------------------------+
> >> 4500 O+ |
> >> | O O O O O
> >> 4000 ++ O O O |
> >> 3500 ++O O O O O O O O O O O |
> >> | O O O |
> >> 3000 ++ O O |
> >> 2500 ++ |
> >> 2000 ++ |
> >> | |
> >> 1500 ++ |
> >> 1000 ++ |
> >> |.*.. .*.. .*. .*.*.. .*.. |
> >> 500 *+ * *.*..*.*. *. .*.. .*.*..* *.*..*.* |
> >> 0 ++----------O---------O-------*----*------O----O---------------------+
> >>
> >> [*] bisect-good sample
> >> [O] bisect-bad sample
> >>
> >> To reproduce:
> >>
> >> git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git
> >> cd lkp-tests
> >> bin/lkp install job.yaml # job file is attached in this email
> >> bin/lkp run job.yaml
> >>
> >>
> >> Disclaimer:
> >> Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
> >> for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
> >> design or configuration may affect actual performance.
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Ying Huang
> >
> >> ---
> >> LKP_SERVER: inn
> >> LKP_CGI_PORT: 80
> >> LKP_CIFS_PORT: 139
> >> testcase: unixbench
> >> default-monitors:
> >> wait: activate-monitor
> >> kmsg:
> >> uptime:
> >> iostat:
> >> vmstat:
> >> numa-numastat:
> >> numa-vmstat:
> >> numa-meminfo:
> >> proc-vmstat:
> >> proc-stat:
> >> interval: 10
> >> meminfo:
> >> slabinfo:
> >> interrupts:
> >> lock_stat:
> >> latency_stats:
> >> softirqs:
> >> bdi_dev_mapping:
> >> diskstats:
> >> nfsstat:
> >> cpuidle:
> >> cpufreq-stats:
> >> turbostat:
> >> pmeter:
> >> sched_debug:
> >> interval: 60
> >> cpufreq_governor: performance
> >> default-watchdogs:
> >> oom-killer:
> >> watchdog:
> >> commit: b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54
> >> model: Ivy Bridge
> >> nr_cpu: 4
> >> memory: 8G
> >> nr_hdd_partitions: 1
> >> hdd_partitions: "/dev/disk/by-id/ata-ST1000DM003-1CH162_Z1DBQSB0-part1"
> >> swap_partitions: "/dev/disk/by-id/ata-ST1000DM003-1CH162_Z1DBQSB0-part3"
> >> rootfs_partition: "/dev/disk/by-id/ata-ST1000DM003-1CH162_Z1DBQSB0-part4"
> >> netconsole_port: 66723
> >> category: benchmark
> >> nr_task: 1
> >> unixbench:
> >> test: fsdisk
> >> queue: bisect
> >> testbox: lkp-ivb-d02
> >> tbox_group: lkp-ivb-d02
> >> kconfig: x86_64-rhel
> >> enqueue_time: 2016-01-05 16:24:11.468660360 +08:00
> >> id: 62c43434378ef50b95fcd4973759daf66a148734
> >> user: lkp
> >> compiler: gcc-4.9
> >> head_commit: 5bae791e5bb8895ac3d65634231c99d79a0e0002
> >> base_commit: 168309855a7d1e16db751e9c647119fe2d2dc878
> >> branch: linux-devel/devel-hourly-2016010502
> >> rootfs: debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz
> >> result_root: "/result/unixbench/performance-1-fsdisk/lkp-ivb-d02/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54/0"
> >> job_file: "/lkp/scheduled/lkp-ivb-d02/bisect_unixbench-performance-1-fsdisk-debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz-x86_64-rhel-b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54-20160105-89027-193oala-0.yaml"
> >> max_uptime: 922.0999999999999
> >> initrd: "/osimage/debian/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz"
> >> bootloader_append:
> >> - root=/dev/ram0
> >> - user=lkp
> >> - job=/lkp/scheduled/lkp-ivb-d02/bisect_unixbench-performance-1-fsdisk-debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz-x86_64-rhel-b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54-20160105-89027-193oala-0.yaml
> >> - ARCH=x86_64
> >> - kconfig=x86_64-rhel
> >> - branch=linux-devel/devel-hourly-2016010502
> >> - commit=b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54
> >> - BOOT_IMAGE=/pkg/linux/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54/vmlinuz-4.4.0-rc6-00236-gb8084f7
> >> - max_uptime=922
> >> - RESULT_ROOT=/result/unixbench/performance-1-fsdisk/lkp-ivb-d02/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54/0
> >> - LKP_SERVER=inn
> >> - |2-
> >>
> >>
> >> earlyprintk=ttyS0,115200 systemd.log_level=err
> >> debug apic=debug sysrq_always_enabled rcupdate.rcu_cpu_stall_timeout=100
> >> panic=-1 softlockup_panic=1 nmi_watchdog=panic oops=panic load_ramdisk=2 prompt_ramdisk=0
> >> console=ttyS0,115200 console=tty0 vga=normal
> >>
> >> rw
> >> lkp_initrd: "/lkp/lkp/lkp-x86_64.cgz"
> >> modules_initrd: "/pkg/linux/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54/modules.cgz"
> >> bm_initrd: "/osimage/deps/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/lkp.cgz,/osimage/deps/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/run-ipconfig.cgz,/osimage/deps/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/turbostat.cgz,/lkp/benchmarks/turbostat.cgz,/lkp/benchmarks/unixbench.cgz"
> >> linux_headers_initrd: "/pkg/linux/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54/linux-headers.cgz"
> >> repeat_to: 2
> >> kernel: "/pkg/linux/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/b8084f70e028697b342d6388b244d6171717fc54/vmlinuz-4.4.0-rc6-00236-gb8084f7"
> >> dequeue_time: 2016-01-05 16:39:47.706440461 +08:00
> >> job_state: finished
> >> loadavg: 0.58 0.25 0.10 1/123 2689
> >> start_time: '1451983209'
> >> end_time: '1451983353'
> >> version: "/lkp/lkp/.src-20160105-162125"
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LKP mailing list
> > LKP@...ts.01.org
> > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/lkp
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists