linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv1 6/6] rdmacg: Added documentation for rdma controller.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 6 Jan 2016 17:57:14 -0500
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Parav Pandit <pandit.parav@...il.com>
Cc:	cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
	lizefan@...wei.com, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
	Liran Liss <liranl@...lanox.com>,
	"Hefty, Sean" <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
	Haggai Eran <haggaie@...lanox.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, james.l.morris@...cle.com,
	serge@...lyn.com, Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
	Matan Barak <matanb@...lanox.com>, raindel@...lanox.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 6/6] rdmacg: Added documentation for rdma controller.

Hello,

On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 04:14:26AM +0530, Parav Pandit wrote:
> Yes. I read through. I can see two changes to be made in V2 version of
> this patch.
> 1. rdma.resource.verb.usage and rdma.resource.verb.limit to change
> respectively to,
> 2. rdma.resource.verb.stat and rdma.resource.verb.max.
> 3. rdma.resource.verb.failcnt indicate failure events, which I think
> should go to events.

What's up with the ".resource" part?  Also can't the .max file list
the available resources?  Why does it need a separtae list file?

> I roll out new patch for events post this patch as additional feature
> and remove this feature in V2.
> 
> rdma.resource.verb.list file is unique to rdma cgroup, so I believe
> this is fine.

Please see above.

> We will conclude whether to have rdma.resource.hw.<files> or not in
> other patches.
> I am in opinion to keep "resource" and "verb" or "hw" tags around to
> keep it verbose enough to know what are we trying to control.

What does that achieve?  I feel that it's getting overengineered
constantly.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/