linux-kernel - RE: [Questions]: how to extend nr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:45:43 +0800
From:	Zhou Qiao(周侨) <qiaozhou@...micro.com>
To:	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	<jason@...edaemon.net>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [Questions]: how to extend nr_irqs for arch arm64

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Gleixner [mailto:tglx@...utronix.de]
> Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 4:04 PM
> To: Zhou Qiao(周侨)
> Cc: jason@...edaemon.net; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [Questions]: how to extend nr_irqs for arch arm64
> 
> On Mon, 11 Jan 2016, Zhou Qiao(周侨) wrote:
> 
> > The nr_irqs is set to NR_IRQS by default and NR_IRQS is small(64).
> > Arch/arm platforms will re-set nr_irqs to a larger value. I didn't
> > find similar way for arm64. The way I can think of is to redefine
> > NR_IRQS. But according comments in include/asm-generic/irq.h, NR_IRQS
> > should not be a large value. so what's the preferred way to extend
> > nr_irqs, for arm64 specifically? Thanks in advance.
> 
> With SPARSE_IRQ enabled the core will modify nr_irqs with the following
> mechanims:
> 
>  - Early boot: arch_probe_nr_irqs(). If the return value of that
> function is >
>    	       NR_IRQS then it will be set to that.
> 
> 	       This is used for interrupts which have to be allocated and
> 	       assigned in early boot, but that's really only for legacy
> 	       purposes. So arm64 should not use that at all.
Agree. Thanks for the details.
> 
>  - Runtime:    The core dynamically increases nr_irqs up to
> IRQ_BITMAP_BITS,
>     	       which is NR_IRQS + 8192.
> 
> The runtime increase is happening, when interrupts are allocated. And
> you won't notice unless you try to extend nr_irqs above NR_IRQS + 8192.
> So there is nothing to do for arm64, it should just work.
I met an issue here. The nr_irqs is extended when the start_irq + cnt >
nr_irqs. So when nr_irqs is not extended(still 64), a device with a large
hr_irq(70) will get a wrong virq. since it will be mod by nr_irqs before
actually allocating the descriptor in irq_domain_alloc_descs. I don't know
what I missed.

static int irq_domain_alloc_descs(int virq, unsigned int cnt,
                  irq_hw_number_t hwirq, int node)
{
    unsigned int hint;

    if (virq >= 0) {
        virq = irq_alloc_descs(virq, virq, cnt, node);
    } else {
        hint = hwirq % nr_irqs;
        if (hint == 0)
            hint++;
        virq = irq_alloc_descs_from(hint, cnt, node);
        if (virq <= 0 && hint > 1)
            virq = irq_alloc_descs_from(1, cnt, node);
    }

    return virq;
}
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	tglx