lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 13 Jan 2016 19:11:56 -0800
From:	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To:	kernel test robot <ying.huang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>, lkp@...org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	0day robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [lkp] [SUNRPC] e1e5693191: +71.4% fsmark.files_per_sec

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 7:05 PM, kernel test robot
<ying.huang@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>
> git://internal_merge_and_test_tree revert-e1e56931915cc3fafb4e17d4e1073e24c0a304ce-e1e56931915cc3fafb4e17d4e1073e24c0a304ce
> commit e1e56931915cc3fafb4e17d4e1073e24c0a304ce ("SUNRPC: Fixup socket wait for memory")
>

Sure, this fixes the regression noticed in your other mail
(ceb5d58b21: -69.2% fsmark.files_per_sec_)

Thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ