lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 18 Jan 2016 16:42:28 +0100
From:	Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
	Kyle McMartin <kyle@...nel.org>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>,
	Calvin Owens <calvinowens@...com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH -next 1/2] printk: move can_use_console out of
 console_trylock_for_printk

On Thu 2016-01-14 13:57:22, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> vprintk_emit() disables preemption around console_trylock_for_printk()
> and console_unlock() calls for a strong reason -- can_use_console()
> check. The thing is that vprintl_emit() can be called on a CPU that
> is not fully brought up yet (!cpu_online()), which potentially can
> cause problems if console driver accesses per-cpu data. A console
> driver can explicitly state that it's safe to call it from !online
> cpu by setting CON_ANYTIME bit in console ->flags. That's why for
> !cpu_online() can_use_console() iterates all the console to find out
> if there is a CON_ANYTIME console, otherwise console_unlock() must be
> avoided.
> 
> call_console_drivers(), called from console_cont_flush() and
> console_unlock(), does the same test during for_each_console() loop.
> However, we can have the following corner case. Assume that we have 2
> cpus -- CPU0 is online, CPU1 is !online; and no CON_ANYTIME consoles
> available.
> 
> CPU0 online                        CPU1 !online
>                                  console_trylock()
>                                  ...
>                                  console_unlock()

Please, where this console_unlock() comes from? If I get this
correctly, this CPU is not online and no CON_ANYTIME console exists
=> can_use_console() fails
  => console_trylock() fails
    => console_unlock() is not called from vprintk_emit().

Best Regards,
Petr

>                                    console_cont_flush
>                                      spin_lock logbuf_lock
>                                      if (!cont.len) {
>                                         spin_unlock logbuf_lock
>                                         return
>                                      }
>                                    for (;;) {
> vprintk_emit
>   spin_lock logbuf_lock
>   log_store
>   spin_unlock logbuf_lock
>                                      spin_lock logbuf_lock
>   !console_trylock_for_printk        msg_print_text
>  return                              console_idx = log_next()
>                                      console_seq++
>                                      console_prev = msg->flags
>                                      spin_unlock logbuf_lock
> 
>                                      call_console_drivers()
>                                        for_each_console(con) {
>                                          if (!cpu_online() &&
>                                              !(con->flags & CON_ANYTIME))
>                                                  continue;
>                                          }
>                                    /*
>                                     * no message printed, we lost it
>                                     */
> vprintk_emit
>   spin_lock logbuf_lock
>   log_store
>   spin_unlock logbuf_lock
>   !console_trylock_for_printk
>  return
>                                    /*
>                                     * go to the beginning of the loop,
>                                     * find out there are new messages,
>                                     * lose it
>                                     */
>                                    }
> 
> This patch moves can_use_console() check out of
> console_trylock_for_printk(). Instead it calls it in two
> non-preemptible sections:
> -- console_cont_flush()
>    can_use_console() call happens with spin_lock logbuf_lock
>    taken and local IRQs disabled, local IRQs are not enabled
>    until call_console_drivers() returns.
> 
> -- console_unlock()
>    can_use_console() call happens with spin_lock logbuf_lock
>    taken and local IRQs disabled, local IRQs are not enabled
>    until call_console_drivers() returns.
> 
> In both cases, we need to know that call_console_drivers() call
> was aborted because of !can_use_console() and we must exit
> console_unlock() function.
> 
> This also lets to drop '!cpu_online() && !(con->flags & CON_ANYTIME)'
> test from call_console_drivers().
> 
> At the same time this patch serves as a preparation to enable
> cond_resched for 'in-direct' console_unlock() callers -- the ones
> that come from vprintk_emit(). The 'direct' ones -- the ones that
> do console_lock()/console_unlock() -- already can cond_resched.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
> ---
>  kernel/printk/printk.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> index 7ebcfea..5cc0ce6 100644
> --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
> +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> @@ -1452,9 +1452,6 @@ static void call_console_drivers(int level,
>  			continue;
>  		if (!con->write)
>  			continue;
> -		if (!cpu_online(smp_processor_id()) &&
> -		    !(con->flags & CON_ANYTIME))
> -			continue;
>  		if (con->flags & CON_EXTENDED)
>  			con->write(con, ext_text, ext_len);
>  		else
> @@ -1500,18 +1497,6 @@ static int have_callable_console(void)
>  }
>  
>  /*
> - * Can we actually use the console at this time on this cpu?
> - *
> - * Console drivers may assume that per-cpu resources have been allocated. So
> - * unless they're explicitly marked as being able to cope (CON_ANYTIME) don't
> - * call them until this CPU is officially up.
> - */
> -static inline int can_use_console(unsigned int cpu)
> -{
> -	return cpu_online(cpu) || have_callable_console();
> -}
> -
> -/*
>   * Try to get console ownership to actually show the kernel
>   * messages from a 'printk'. Return true (and with the
>   * console_lock held, and 'console_locked' set) if it
> @@ -1519,21 +1504,7 @@ static inline int can_use_console(unsigned int cpu)
>   */
>  static int console_trylock_for_printk(void)
>  {
> -	unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> -
> -	if (!console_trylock())
> -		return 0;
> -	/*
> -	 * If we can't use the console, we need to release the console
> -	 * semaphore by hand to avoid flushing the buffer. We need to hold the
> -	 * console semaphore in order to do this test safely.
> -	 */
> -	if (!can_use_console(cpu)) {
> -		console_locked = 0;
> -		up_console_sem();
> -		return 0;
> -	}
> -	return 1;
> +	return console_trylock();
>  }
>  
>  int printk_delay_msec __read_mostly;
> @@ -2177,10 +2148,23 @@ int is_console_locked(void)
>  	return console_locked;
>  }
>  
> -static void console_cont_flush(char *text, size_t size)
> +/*
> + * Can we actually use the console at this time on this cpu?
> + *
> + * Console drivers may assume that per-cpu resources have been allocated. So
> + * unless they're explicitly marked as being able to cope (CON_ANYTIME) don't
> + * call them until this CPU is officially up.
> + */
> +static inline int can_use_console(void)
> +{
> +	return cpu_online(smp_processor_id()) || have_callable_console();
> +}
> +
> +static bool console_cont_flush(char *text, size_t size)
>  {
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	size_t len;
> +	bool ret = true;
>  
>  	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&logbuf_lock, flags);
>  
> @@ -2195,15 +2179,21 @@ static void console_cont_flush(char *text, size_t size)
>  	if (console_seq < log_next_seq && !cont.cons)
>  		goto out;
>  
> +	if (!can_use_console()) {
> +		ret = false;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
>  	len = cont_print_text(text, size);
>  	raw_spin_unlock(&logbuf_lock);
>  	stop_critical_timings();
>  	call_console_drivers(cont.level, NULL, 0, text, len);
>  	start_critical_timings();
>  	local_irq_restore(flags);
> -	return;
> +	return ret;
>  out:
>  	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&logbuf_lock, flags);
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -2227,7 +2217,7 @@ void console_unlock(void)
>  	static u64 seen_seq;
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	bool wake_klogd = false;
> -	bool do_cond_resched, retry;
> +	bool do_cond_resched, retry, aborted = false;
>  
>  	if (console_suspended) {
>  		up_console_sem();
> @@ -2248,7 +2238,12 @@ void console_unlock(void)
>  	console_may_schedule = 0;
>  
>  	/* flush buffered message fragment immediately to console */
> -	console_cont_flush(text, sizeof(text));
> +	if (!console_cont_flush(text, sizeof(text))) {
> +		console_locked = 0;
> +		up_console_sem();
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>  again:
>  	for (;;) {
>  		struct printk_log *msg;
> @@ -2257,6 +2252,12 @@ again:
>  		int level;
>  
>  		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&logbuf_lock, flags);
> +
> +		if (!can_use_console()) {
> +			aborted = true;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
>  		if (seen_seq != log_next_seq) {
>  			wake_klogd = true;
>  			seen_seq = log_next_seq;
> @@ -2337,7 +2338,7 @@ skip:
>  	 * flush, no worries.
>  	 */
>  	raw_spin_lock(&logbuf_lock);
> -	retry = console_seq != log_next_seq;
> +	retry = !aborted && (console_seq != log_next_seq);
>  	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&logbuf_lock, flags);
>  
>  	if (retry && console_trylock())
> -- 
> 2.7.0
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ