lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 18 Jan 2016 03:18:35 +0000
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	"David Vrabel" <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
	"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	"Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 26/70] xen/pciback: Return error on XEN_PCI_OP_enable_msix
 when device has MSI or MSI-X enabled

3.2.76-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>

commit 5e0ce1455c09dd61d029b8ad45d82e1ac0b6c4c9 upstream.

The guest sequence of:

  a) XEN_PCI_OP_enable_msix
  b) XEN_PCI_OP_enable_msix

results in hitting an NULL pointer due to using freed pointers.

The device passed in the guest MUST have MSI-X capability.

The a) constructs and SysFS representation of MSI and MSI groups.
The b) adds a second set of them but adding in to SysFS fails (duplicate entry).
'populate_msi_sysfs' frees the newly allocated msi_irq_groups (note that
in a) pdev->msi_irq_groups is still set) and also free's ALL of the
MSI-X entries of the device (the ones allocated in step a) and b)).

The unwind code: 'free_msi_irqs' deletes all the entries and tries to
delete the pdev->msi_irq_groups (which hasn't been set to NULL).
However the pointers in the SysFS are already freed and we hit an
NULL pointer further on when 'strlen' is attempted on a freed pointer.

The patch adds a simple check in the XEN_PCI_OP_enable_msix to guard
against that. The check for msi_enabled is not stricly neccessary.

This is part of XSA-157

Reviewed-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
 drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pciback_ops.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pciback_ops.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pciback_ops.c
@@ -204,9 +204,16 @@ int xen_pcibk_enable_msix(struct xen_pci
 	if (unlikely(verbose_request))
 		printk(KERN_DEBUG DRV_NAME ": %s: enable MSI-X\n",
 		       pci_name(dev));
+
 	if (op->value > SH_INFO_MAX_VEC)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	if (dev->msix_enabled)
+		return -EALREADY;
+
+	if (dev->msi_enabled)
+		return -ENXIO;
+
 	entries = kmalloc(op->value * sizeof(*entries), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (entries == NULL)
 		return -ENOMEM;

Powered by blists - more mailing lists