linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] tty/serial: atmel: Include module.h to fix build failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 18 Jan 2016 09:17:34 -0800
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	postmaster <postmaster@...r.kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] tty/serial: atmel: Include module.h to fix build
 failure

On 01/18/2016 09:04 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 08:36:38AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 01/13/2016 02:32 AM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 09:44:10PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 21:35 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>>> On 01/11/2016 07:08 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>>>>>> On 2016-01-11 06:11 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 02:05:36PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 10:29:08AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 10:15:35AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> If serial/atmel_serial.c is compiled with devicetree enabled, the
>>> <snip>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sudip, one option would be to set up a semi-private mailing list.
>>>>> My build tests now have a dedicated virtual host (kerneltests.org).
>>>>> I could set up a managed list there.
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps it'd be better to have something like linux-build-failures@...r.kernel.org
>>>
>>> yes, much better. But if me and Guenter are the only two members of that
>>> list then it will not look nice. :)
>>>
>>
>> How about just using kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org ? That list already exists and,
>> for all practical purposes, has been abandoned.
>
> Great. I am subscribing to it.
>

Let's check on the list first. I'll send am e-mail.

Guenter