lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 19 Jan 2016 16:07:15 -0800
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Марк Коренберг 
	<socketpair@...il.com>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	lkp@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] pipe: limit the per-user amount of pages allocated in pipes

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 7:36 AM, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu> wrote:
> On no-so-small systems, it is possible for a single process to cause an
> OOM condition by filling large pipes with data that are never read. A
> typical process filling 4000 pipes with 1 MB of data will use 4 GB of
> memory. On small systems it may be tricky to set the pipe max size to
> prevent this from happening.
>
> This patch makes it possible to enforce a per-user soft limit above
> which new pipes will be limited to a single page, effectively limiting
> them to 4 kB each, as well as a hard limit above which no new pipes may
> be created for this user. T

Al, should I take this directly, or is it coming through your tree?

             Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists